Amazon Interview Practice

Question: 1 / 400

When persuading others to change their mind, which approach is beneficial?

Using emotional appeals without facts

Employing the STAR method to structure arguments

Employing the STAR method to structure arguments is an effective approach for persuading others to change their mind because it provides a clear and systematic way to present your case. The STAR method stands for Situation, Task, Action, and Result, which allows you to outline the context of the issue, the specific challenges faced, the actions taken to address those challenges, and the outcomes of those actions. This structured approach can make your argument more compelling and easier for the listener to follow.

By illustrating a situation with concrete examples and detailed evidence, you create a persuasive narrative that appeals to both logic and credibility. This method also demonstrates a thoughtful consideration of the topic, likely making it more persuasive to your audience, as it combines both factual information and relevant experiences in a cohesive manner.

In contrast, relying solely on emotional appeals without facts may lead to a lack of substance in your argument, while ignoring the other person's perspective alienates them and makes it difficult to engage in constructive dialogue. Stating only personal experiences can limit the breadth of the argument and may not resonate with others who seek more than anecdotal evidence. Therefore, the STAR method is advantageous because it effectively integrates structured reasoning, storytelling, and the recognition of outcomes, leading to greater persuasiveness.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Ignoring their perspective entirely

Only stating personal experiences

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy